At the risk of sounding like a complete jerk, what’s up with some cyclists around Baltimore who tote around like seven pounds of safety gear but don’t wear helmets? A guy just rode up University Parkway with bright dayglow gloves, jacket, hat and pannier. But no helmet. He had a half-dozen red lights, including one on his hat.
I suppose one could respond that the nature of his gear was to prevent a wreck, not to protect himself. Maybe he likes his bike a lot and does not want a crash. Maybe he likes cars and does not want to mess up people’s cars that might hit him.
Or maybe he thinks that getting hit from behind by a car that does not see him is the only way he’s going to get smashed. Not the Door Prize. Not jerk-ass joggers who avoid empty sidewalks to walk swiftly with jaunty hips in the bike lanes, with traffic, not against it. Not holes in the road or old storm drains with grates that run parallel to the street. Just saying.
I’m genuinely confused — not trying to start a helmet vs. no-helmet fight. I’ll cop to riding sans helmet during the two months in 2005 between when I bought my bike and when we sold our car. I’m confused most by folks who clearly have safety in mind but still don’t wear helmets.
Tags: Baltimore, bicycle, bicycles, bike, Bikes, charm city, Cycling, cyclists

5 comments
Comments feed for this article
Trackback link
http://www.pragmatik.org/blog/2008/03/safety-gear-but-no-helmets/trackback/
March 24, 2008 at 7:41 pm
Matthew
I share your confusion, Johnny. There’s a guy in the architecture next door to our office in clipper mill - very nice guy who rides to work regularly - and he is always sans helmet. I can understand enjoying the feeling of being helmet-free, but when you’re riding with traffic all around, it doesn’t make sense.
March 26, 2008 at 4:22 pm
Richard Keatinge
I’m confused by your confusion. Helmets don’t work and discourage cycling, see http://www.bmj.com/cgi/content/full/332/7543/722-a,
but lights may well increase safety, though I appreciate there’s no direct evidence to that effect, see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bicycle_lighting
March 26, 2008 at 4:37 pm
Johnny
I didn’t want to take a position on helmets and start some argument, since there is overwhelming research in both directions that overwhelms me. :^)
Who knows which study/studies to believe? The good ones have empirical evidence and science to back them up, but they can’t all be right.
What I don’t hear a lot of is “I went through a windshield with my head sans helmet and survived intact.” When we do hear stories of helmets [allegedly] saving people so often, I would think anti-helmet folks would publicize such stories of helmets not helping. I have only known of one person to survive a bad accident sans helmet, and he was in a coma for two weeks (hit by a dumptruck! yikes!). My friend has an in-law who has some brain damage because of a spill from a pothole. No helmet, and he cracked his head, never to be the same again, from what I hear.
I’ve had enough head injuries. It’s not like helmets are prohibitively expensive, heavy or uncomfortable. Even if a helmet won’t save my life literally, it’s worth having just in case. It’s not a big sacrifice.
Anyway, thanks for the links. I don’t want to get into a pro-helmet preaching match:)
March 26, 2008 at 6:57 pm
ron
the original confusion is over why someone would think about safety and not wear a helmet. unless you think helmets are dangerous, what’s confusing about that confusion?
helmets discourage biking? in america, it’s cars and theft.
April 1, 2008 at 12:16 am
Sleepnow in Dafar
Helmets don’t work? Sounds like someone has hit their head one too many times. Maybe if you had a helmet on you wouldn’t think that.