I guess she doesn’t have one? Among the many questions she dodged last night, this was the most artless. Avoiding questions you don’t want to answer might make for a “good” debater. But after as many as she did, it sounded like she was overly-coached, ignorant, evasive or just plain rude. When asked what her Achilles Heal was, she listed her…strengths. Which leads me to ask: Sarah Palin, do you know what “Achilles Heel” means? After some of the things that came out of her mouth, I think she might not really understand the concept. Among many others.
Tags: 2008, biden, debate, election, mccain, obama, palin, sarah palin

9 comments
Comments feed for this article
Trackback link
http://www.pragmatik.org/blog/2008/10/sarah-palins-achilles-heel/trackback/
October 12, 2008 at 10:51 pm
Pingback from Pragmatik · My Achilles Heel.
October 3, 2008 at 11:27 am
joan
Thank God you get it!!!
I was afraid I was the only one sitting in my living room last night astounded at how ignorant she sounded.
Thank you, thank you, thank you!
October 3, 2008 at 12:43 pm
Johnny
At several moments, I wanted The Truth Police to throw a bucket of water on her delicate hair style, just to wake someone up.
October 3, 2008 at 3:18 pm
Liz
I thought she was patronizing toward Biden with her “Oh, Joe…” comments. And her reference to championing women’s rights? Ha! I agree; she probably doesn’t know what an Achilles Heel is. Must be her handlers didn’t cover that in her coaching/cramming sessions.
October 3, 2008 at 3:37 pm
Johnny
When she mentioned women’s rights, F and I yelled “HA!!” loudly enough that she might have heard it:)
October 4, 2008 at 1:01 pm
Network Geek
I think it’s funny that you think her actual ability has anything to do with whether or not people vote for McCain. In general, people vote based on personalities, not actual ability, or even the issues at hand.
I also think it’s funny that people still seem to think that the Democrats are significantly different than the Republicans. Both parties are terribly out of touch with the real issues that face real Americans. Both parties spout rhetoric without really doing much good to anyone, except those people that give them money. Yes, both parties. Both parties serve whatever special interest group donates the most money. Period.
Maybe it’s time that we remember there are other choices. The United States of America has more than two political parties. And, the people who say to vote for a third party is throwing away their vote are, in fact, throwing away their vote. If enough people voted for a third party, things could change. We’ve been stuck inside the same political paradigm box for so long that everyone seems incapable of seeing out of it, much less actually voting outside that box.
Just a little food for thought. No calories. Sugar free.
October 4, 2008 at 6:32 pm
Johnny
Er, I never said that Palin’s abilities would change people’s votes for McCain. I doubt anything that happens in the debates will change many people’s minds. I think the last eight years show us that abilities have little to do with how people vote. I never said that at all and certainly not in this post.
Maybe both parties are out of touch with the issues that face most Americans and are motivated by the dollar, but that does make them similar over-all. If they both ignore issues, it’s in favor of pretty different things, i.e., big government, legislating religion, big military, small military, big oil, big coal, etc. I don’t think doing the same wrong things makes two parties the same any more than being bad drivers would make a white supremacist and a hippie the same.
My [current and qualified] support of the Democratic party should not imply any ignorance on my part of third party choices. One might as well say that I am ignorant of Republican choices. I don’t prefer Obama because I don’t know about third party candidates.
Under the electoral college, some might argue that a lot of us throw our votes away, but I don’t think anyone who votes throws their vote away, no matter who they vote for. (That sounds cheesy now that I type it.) I would vote for a third party candidate if there were one I could get behind, certainly. But it’s often a matter of voting for the lesser evil, even with a hundred parties. The “box” is bigger than the two big parties, for sure.
October 4, 2008 at 11:01 pm
Network Geek
Sorry, when I wrote “people”, I meant, “people in general”, not just you.
And, I don’t think either of the two biggest parties actually *act* all that differently. Their rhetoric may be different, but, in the end, they both seem to do basically the same things and with the same general concern for the “average citizen”, if such a thing even exists. What they say, and how they say it, matters less than what they actually do about it. Frankly, no matter what they say they want to do, politicians are more interested in getting re-elected than making any real changes.
I really think that people tend to get caught in a choice between Democrat and Republican, or even Conservative and Liberal, when there are more choices we can make. I think it’s time we give someone who’s not part of either of the largest two political machines a turn at bat. Surely they can’t do any worse than we’ve seen in the past 16 years! I don’t trust either set of candidates, for different reasons, sure, but still… Look, I grew up outside of Chicago, and I’m the fifth generation to do so. I grew up learning not to trust a Chicago politician on principle and I’ve extended that to all politicians.
And, you know what? We need more of that cheesy talk about how important our votes are and more people who believe it. For years, I was the only person I knew in my age demographic who bothered to vote at all. Really, we need more people who just care to make it more than debates, sound bites, and handsome/pretty candidates.
I’ve had enough of the evil I know and I’m ready to try out some new evils. The old ones will still be there the next time around if the new evils don’t do any better. But how will we ever know if no one ever hears about them or votes for them?
October 5, 2008 at 9:29 am
Johnny
I’d be very happy with a third party candidate. I’m told that I’m more “libertarian” than “democratic,” LOL, but I think I’m under Obama’s spell. Though, as a VISTA, I can’t campaign, so that statement must be qualified. :)
Now that I think of it, the partisanship game is something everyone’s playing very well now, so maybe the Rs and Ds are doing at least one thing pretty much the same. Er, maybe consistently, not well. When it’s the whole “us or them” scenario, I think you’re right that people ignore their other choices. Hell, I think people get so stuck where they already are, they ignore second party choices!