Socialism and Liberalism.

ultrafine0609
Article proposing differences between [Obama's] increasing liberalism in government and socialism:

“We aren’t headed for an era of socialism at all, since socialism is not a natural outgrowth of liberalism. Liberalism is a political philosophy that seeks to extend personal autonomy to as many people as possible, if necessary through positive government action; socialism, by contrast, seeks as much equality as possible, even if doing so curtails individual liberty. These are differences of kind, not degree– differences that have historically placed the two philosophies in direct competition. Today, socialism is on the decline, in large part because liberalism has lately been on the rise. And, if Barack Obama’s version of liberalism succeeds, socialism will be even less popular than it already is.”  (Read more.)

(Post your anti-liberal and/or anti-socialist and/or completely unrelated comments with the article on TNR or on your own site please, not here.  To the SPAM filter they go.   People using my freakin website to vent their issues in an unrelated way and not coming back is getting annoying.)

Tags: , , ,

  1. I think that’s an ‘ultra fine point’ made in that article. Thanks for posting it Johnny.

  2. I thought it was a pretty nice piece. Hell, I wish I wrote it:)

  3. Do I get a socialistic rant if I keep coming back?

  4. Please do! I was talking about certain right-wingers who troll around, leave unrelated comments and then never show up to answer for them. :)

    Socialism is really something I wish I understood better in a non-bookish way.