rant1009
If you like good books, you have to read Chuck Palahniuk’s Rant. Oh. I want to tell you about all the incredible surprises — and they are pretty incredible — but I can’t. I don’t want to give away any more than what’s on the dust jacket.  If you’re a fan of Chuck’s, you won’t be disappointed.  You’ll see why he chose to write something as “light” as Snuff after this magnificent tome.  If you’re not already a fan of the author of Fight Club, read this book — and you will be.

Me, I scored a signed copy of this in New York last June!

bike1oct1009
It looked like this.

Busy with work, family, Baby, etc. Don’t go away. I have some very nice fall photos to post!

phofriaut09
Took a long ride around the city yesterday and witnessed some overwhelming colors. Photo Friday: Autumn 2009.

I spoke at an event yesterday about alternative transportation. Afterward, a few people rushed up to tell me, “Great job!”

Now, I am a TERRIBLE public speaker.

So I wondered, just how badly did it go, that folks had to tell me it went well? :)

moles_1_1009
Not exclusive of being good at anything else.  One grows tired of people treating you like you can’t do anything “practical” right because “of all that college.”  In many instances (some lately), certain folks have actually gotten bossy with me in the context of us being peers because they assumed that I could not accomplish the task at hand because I spent my 20s studying philosophy.  Hmm.  Turned out that I knew how to do it better in several instances, and it was completely unrelated to school.

I want to smack everyone who throws around the term “Book Smart.”

Usually such folks are either not “book smart” and feel the need to justify their inability to understand books, or they are only “book smart” and feel the need to justify not being good at other things.

Guess what?  If you can ONLY do one thing, you’re not SMART at all!  Animals and machines can be good at one thing.

That said, I don’t actually know more than a handful of people who are only good at one thing.  Folks just pigeon-hole themselves into not exploring other things they might be good at.  A lot of the “book smart” people I know could probably master outdoor skills if they went camping and, well, had to.  And a lot of the people I know who do not consider themselves “book smart” but can rebuild things and who understand how things work would probably understand Aristotle better than some of my less giften classmates over the years, if they tried to read it.

Maybe we need to redefine what we mean by SMART as a culture?

phofridawn1009.jpg
Little-known fact, since I wear glasses and since my eyes look older than I am.  [Last] Photo Friday: Dawn.

outside1009
Taking the bus lately, I enjoy much more human interaction than you get when you travel by car or even by bike. But what I’m missing is outside time, which was/is a benefit of cycling to work.  I haven’t had to wear socks to work until today, when it’s raining and in the 40s.  I’m altogether too protected from the elements.

I got nothing but outside time this weekend, and it was fantastic.  From the spiders and deer to my wet feet and chattering teeth, I got a big dose of Mother Nature/Earth on our little camping trip.  But the end of Saturday, I was not bothered with being dirty.  By Sunday morning, shedding layers, sweating and packing/cleaninp up our campsite, I was elated over how stinky and dirty I had gotten.  I smelled like sweat, baby wipes, campfire and coffee.  I arrived home  in flannel PJ pants, a flannel shirt, dirty and wet socked/sandaled feet and visibly dirty.  Awesome.

I love living in the city.  The best way to really enjoy the outdoors is to enjoy it, not cut it down to live in a small piece of it, poison the air getting there and also waterways and the land itself with roads, etc.  I do want to retire and die in a little cabin one day, but that will have a small footprint.  But I haven’t been getting out enough even in the city lately.  Few walks, few cycling trips, little of anything.  Monday, I got three hours to show a nice guy around Baltimore for three hours.  It was his first time in Charm City.  So we walked from Midtown all the way to the Inner Harbor and East to Fell’s Point — and back.  It was tired, and we scored big sandwiches when we got back.  I gave a walking tour of Central Baltimore the next day and earned my pasta dinner.  These are improvements.

But now it’s raining and nasty today, and I haven’t even gone to get my afternoon coffee yet.

chfwgm1009
There was a gateway competition at camp this past weekend, and the boys wanted to do “The Raven.”  The rules stipulated that the gateway was to be made at camp, out of “natural materials”, by hand.  No bust of Pallas, then.  But the boys found this bust in a closet and thought it would work well with the bamboo they lashed together.  We found a robin in a store’s garden section and painted it black for the raven itself.  Hunting decoys were too expensive.  The “raven” was fixed by lashing a pole behind The Chief and then around the bird.

From camping.  And “civilization” means a few very crazy weeks at work, including a VERY last-minute site-visit tomorrow when I was hoping to work from home and continue the fight against getting sick.

Autumn is here, though, and that is damned fine.

And my waistpack smells like campfire, after my friend Zack and I sat around one last night for 4-5 hours, including melting two glass rootbeer (yes, ROOTbeer) bottles in the center/coals of said fire.  For the record, it was Zack’s idea.  I thought they’d explode, even empty.

I also kinda lost my cool and yelled [shortly] at a few kids who, in my defense, totally deserved it and needed to wake up a little to unexpected pains in the ass that come with being an adult and sometimes come when you’re fifteen.  I think it worked for the time, and there were/are no hard feelings.  Unless there’s a heartless revenge headed my way.  In which case, it did not, in fact work.

I am deliriously tired.

Aside from some small possible rain, the weather looks nice, too.  I have my food packed, but not clothes.  I’ll get around to it.  Been out shopping for it the past two evenings.  I’m freakin tired already.  Our boys are doing a gateway to their campsite made from natural materials and based on “The Raven.”  I’m proud of them.

beachtable1009
I was at a talk once during my first year of college wherein Maryland Representative Elijah E. Cummings counseled young African Americans to “fake it til you make it!” (As an aside, I should mention that I have very positive feelings for Mr. Cummings, very positive.) I was confused and horrified. Despite my own faking and non-making, as an 18-year-old, the idea of faking was odious to me. I mean, I walked around with a ponytail, Docs and philosophy books in my own efforts at faking and making. But I was too stupid to realize it then. Faking it? On purpose? What? Where’s the necessary connection between acting one way and then becoming it?

Well, I’ve learned a lot since then. I’ve read Existentialism (Sartre, Nietzsche, et al) and Pragmatism and learned all about how our actions play on our conceptions, metal states, personalities, identities, etc. I also pulled my head out of my ass and realized that our personalities do not define our actions so much as the other way around. Even moods.  If you walk around bitching all day, you turn into a bitch.

In case you somehow missed it, I’m a moody man. Pessimistic. Nit-picky.  At times depressed.  In my defense, there are genetics (I don’t wanna talk about it) involved in depression and general gloom and resentment to a world that continually fucks us all over (don’t kid yourself).

But it’s also part of what has become my “image.”  I’m critical.  I have an opinion on everything, usually negative.  You know, people are more likely to think you’re smart if you act like that than if you think everything’s awesome.  Anyone can do that, right?  And if you’re insecure and arrogant (you can be both), you just about need everyone to think you’re smart and good and valuable and fun to be around  because the — at times — incredibly crushing things you say about people, products and situations tell people that you are witty and funny.

It also makes you a pain in the ass, as my wife reminds me.

With a little one on the way in six months, I think I’d like to learn to be more optimistic or, at least, less doomy and gloomy and hateful.  I thought about it, and in some essentialist bullshit decided that it’s not in me.  My blood comes from four grandparents.  One was depressed and, well, lost it, but was otherwise by all counts a sweet person.  (I don’t wanna talk about it.)  One was a terrible father to my father and the biggest example of a P-word I’ve ever met.  One turned out to be an evil bitch.  One I never met but never heard anything bad about.  My parents are very good people, but they each had one piece of shit to match their good parent, and my father’s mother died when he was nine.  Any sunny outlook on their parts came from sheer will.  So I should be able to do likewise, no?

How?  Faking it?  Maybe that’s bad terminology.  Acting like the world doesn’t disgust me is probably more than faking.  I mean, if we look hard enough, there are enough good things in the univserse that we don’t have to fake not wishing existence itself would cease, right?  Whenever I see the ultrasound image of my child, I can’t be mad or upset about anything.  I’m all smiles and giggles (yes, giggles, at work and  on the bus), and I want to buy everyone a coffee and give them free hugs.  So maybe it’s not faking it.  It’s in selecting what to judge the world by.

tide1009
I am not a constant worker. That is, I cannot sit for 8 hours doing the same thing. I never have been able to. Instead, I can usually get done said amount of work in a fraction of the time, with plenty of time for playing/relaxing. (Admitting this just might be why I got accused of being arrogant.) I work in spurts. But I don’t understand why my admitting a weakness (i.e., combination of a short attention span and just plain laziness) leads to charges of arrogance (ahem).

Anyway. School work. It usually happens that I do all my reading. Research. Notes. Outline. Bam, I sit down and write a seminar-length paper in one sitting, that needs minimal editing. My secret is thinking about it for a long time first, so that I really am only going through the formality of typing and composing actual sentences around the cute aphorisms I’m storing in my brain.  Really.  I’m so lazy and have so much trouble paying attention to anything that I have trick myself into working.  No shit.

I tricked myself into cranking out incredible amounts of work today leading to a robust introduction and first chapter of my dissertation.  I found delicious kernels of Pragmatism not only in Emerson, but also in Thoreau.  Textual references that are not bullshit and mis-quoted and taken out of context.  So instead of beefing up the scholarship on my definition of Pragmatism by quoting James scholars, I found a dialogue between Peirce, James, Emerson and Thoreau on the relation of thought and action.  Delicious.

I don’t know why I’m writing this.  I’m exhausted and just enjoyed a nice beer and should be reading a trashy novel before hitting the sack.  I suppose it’s largely because I spent the last few months of 2006 and the first half of 2007 researching and writing the damned thing without ever talking about it with anyone aside from my wife, who was also burdened with writing her own.

What is my dissertation about?

An exploration of the possible usefulness of hate.  Via an exploration of how pervasive hate is and what Pragmatism means to me; a discussion of Nietzsche’s view of hate using all of his published philosophical writing; proposed solutions for how to make hate useful.  Sounds sunny and easy, no?

I will admit for the first time to myself that I spent entirely too much time reading and reflecting on and writing about Nietzsche.  But they want scholarship.  Still, I spent over three months doing nothing but reading and taking notes on Nietzsche.  Do I really get him?  I’m sure some of my colleagues would say that I do not because I am not entirely familiar with the scholarship on him.  Somewhat familiar with it and equally bored by it.  I would, arrogantly, reply that I am familiar with Nietzsche‘s work, and I couldn’t give less of a shit what some deconstructionist in a cafe’ thinks about Freddy’s relationship with his mother or how this or that “scholar” had reduced all of the multifarious things Nietzsche said to one principle, phobia or sexual deviance.

That one might posit that another person might not “get” a philosopher because one spent more time reading the primary material than the secondary material is one of the reasons that I am leaving (and in most ways have already left) academic philosophy behind. Behind in an “I’m better than that” sense?  No, don’t get your panties in a bunch.  If reading philosophy journals and going to conferences is your thing, that’s cool.  You do yours, and I’ll do mine.

I can’t help but think that there’s a point where we’re supposed to stop reading about philosophy and reading people who write about it and what other people have written about what these people have written and start, you know, doing it.  Or is it really just an academic discipline and not a mode of living?

Don’t answer that.

arrogant1009
I got called arrogant about five times this weekend, with only one such labeling coming from myself. If you are better at Xtask than Ynumber of people, are you still arrogant?

phofrifastfood
Layton’s in Ocean City (Maryland). For Photo Friday: Fast Food.