Yes. Something she’s not supposed to do for another few months, according to parental reading material. She does this adorable thing where she smiles at you like you wouldn’t believe the first time she sees you every morning. Yesterday, I gave her the deep voiced, “CHAR-LOTTE!” that often calms her down on the changing table. (Flailing baby limbs and a deeply poopy diaper don’t mix!)  She smiled and cooed.  I followed this up with some “Bah bah dee bee bah dah bah dappah beepy booh!” with the same voice into her ear/the side of her head.  She laughed.  I mean to say that she smiled hugely, shook and made guttural noises from her open-mouthed smile.  She chuckled.  And, to prove it was no fluke, we did this at least ten times.

She was laughing hard enough that I was afraid she might pee her pants; so I stopped.  But then I remembered that she’s a baby in diapers and probably was already peeing her pants and does it like fifteen times a day anyway.  And then I felt silly.

Overheard this morning:

Man:  “Damn, she [Abby Sunderland] was trying to out-do her brother.  He was the youngest person to sail around the world.  And then she fucked up.  Nice way to prove that girls can’t do anything right.”

Woman:  “Yeah, thanks a lot, bitch.  Like we really need that shit.”

Personally, I think it’s pretty freakin awesome to sail around the world, even in a boat with SHOE CITY on the side of it.  I wish I’d had the guts to do that ever.  I certainly don’t buy into the notion that the female members of our species can’t do anything right.  My wife can school me in most things (save cooking and beard-growing).

Be Prepared.”

It doesn’t mean carrying everything you own in your car in the event that you need a case of expired soda on hand or might want to play football in the 7-11 parking lot.  It doesn’t mean carrying survival gear on the bus like  you’re going into the bush.  It doesn’t mean that your iPhone will save you when you get lost and try talking to it, or even giving it kisses via the touch screen.

In case you were wondering.

I wonder what all the dummies who referred to the mounds of snow in Maryland this winter as “piles of global warming” think about the boiling temperatures and a heatwave we haven’t seen in, literally, years.  I guess a radio personality will have to tell them what slogan to blather and bleat about the heat now.


The Jif peanut butter commercial wherein they say something stupid like, “Choosy moms choose Jif,” was on this morning when I was watching the news. Because, you know, having a vagina grants you special wisdom in parenting, right? Or maybe it was condescending to women, i.e., “You can’t work, and men rule the world, but damn — you can pick out a mean peanut butter!”

This time, the commercial said, “Choosy moms — and dads — choose Jiff.” What? Does this mean that fathers are now legitimized as people capable of taking care of our children? We get credit for picking a peanut butter now? Wow. I mean, now a piece of consumer America is giving us a nod? We must have evolved as parents and people without vaginas at the same time.

Then again. They could be insulting us. I mean, choosy dads choose Peter Pan, yo.

Okay now.  Despite my long-running blog, I am an introvert.  There.  I said it.  You know what that entails, so I won’t repeat it.  I have good friends and family members who are also introverts.  So I know how annoying we can be.  We aren’t verbal with our feelings.  We don’t like to go out much.  We hate meeting new people.  You have to try and “read” us because we don’t wear our hearts on our sleeves.  Etc.

“Do you know someone who needs hours alone every day? Who loves quiet conversations about feelings or ideas, and can give a dynamite presentation to a big audience, but seems awkward in groups and maladroit at small talk? Who has to be dragged to parties and then needs the rest of the day to recuperate? Who growls or scowls or grunts or winces when accosted with pleasantries by people who are just trying to be nice?

If so, do you tell this person he is ‘too serious,’ or ask if he is okay? Regard him as aloof, arrogant, rude? Redouble your efforts to draw him out?

If you answered yes to these questions, chances are that you have an introvert on your hands-and that you aren’t caring for him properly. Science has learned a good deal in recent years about the habits and requirements of introverts. It has even learned, by means of brain scans, that introverts process information differently from other people (I am not making this up). If you are behind the curve on this important matter, be reassured that you are not alone. Introverts may be common, but they are also among the most misunderstood and aggrieved groups in America, possibly the world.”  (more….)

I wonder sometimes if extroverts know how amazingly insufferable they can be.  I am talking about people who scarcely have a thought in their little heads that doesn’t manifest itself in words that whosoever is closest or the best listener has to sit through.  Sure, we introverts can be hard to figure out.  But we [generally] don’t dump all of our drama onto other people (save sometimes in blogs).  Then again.  I guess some extroverts would have to be told that they are annoying by another person because they’d never figure it out.  (Whereas an introvert would never listen and would have to figure it out him- or herself.  I know.)

I’ve gotten the impression that some extroverts I know actually look down on me because I’m not “forward” or “upfront,” because you can’t read my mind, because understanding an introvert requires one to actually listen, because I’m not very sociable or a good public speaker, etc.  If you’re an introvert, you’ve probably heard the same things from people who can’t seem to keep their mouths shut.

“Loners often hear from well-meaning peers that they need to be more social, but the implication that they’re merely black-and-white opposites of their bubbly peers misses the point. Introverts aren’t just less sociable than extroverts; they also engage with the world in fundamentally different ways. While outgoing people savor the nuances of social interaction, loners tend to focus more on their own ideas—and on stimuli that don’t register in the minds of others. Social engagement drains them, while quiet time gives them an energy boost.” (more….)

I find myself looking down on extreme examples of extroverts, too.  We look down on people who can’t read without doing it out loud.  I can’t help (it seems) but to look down on people who can’t think without doing so out loud.  I cannot  understand why someone would need an external sounding board for every little ache and pain, every source of stress, every decision.  I’m sure such a person would not be able to understand the need for privacy and alone time either and would probably think I’m creepy.  Fair enough.  But which takes more strength?  Or, is that even the point?

I don’t remember my point.  I just found articles while I was annoyed with extroverts.  Maybe.

Oh, yeah.  What’s more annoying than an extrovert?  (I think I might have said this before.)  An extrovert who thinks that she/he is an introvert!  I know at least three people who think they’re introverts because they believe that alone time is cool, that introverts are deep, that caring people are all introverts, etc.  But.  Well.  It ain’t true.  Or, if it is, they’re not introverts when I ever see them.  Whence the freaking mystique over being a person who likes alone time and who processes things internally?

I wish that I could snap out of it sometimes.

I can only imagine that being a father and an introvert are going to clash harshly.

There is a difference between merely not having a focus and being unfocused.  This goes for photography and for, you know, real life.

By now, I’m sure you’ve heard about BP’s verbal mis-steps.  And their excuses.  And their apologies.  But I think they’ve got something else working.

See, they call people on the Gulf “small people” and refer to the Gulf itself is a big “ocean.”  Then people get really really upset about that.  Then BP apologizes, maybe makes fun of itself.  Then we forgive them.  And we forget about the other thing.

Because a little bad verbiage is much easier to apologize for and redeem oneself for than, you know, a massive oil spill.

Brilliant!


We took Charlotte for a walk this evening because she’s been fussy from when we get home until she goes to bed all week.  We passed a man who said something about her pretty blue eyes.  I looked at my wife and joked that there will come a time that I would punch someone in the face for that.  Oh, the teenage years will be fun.

But, yes, her eyes really are this blue.

….from people who haven’t done a lick of research, who don’t even have any kids and who just feel a certain way about it?

Oh, I don’t know — maybe having to constantly hand-hold people on the same sinking boat you’re on?  I’m tired of being everyone’s flippin therapist.  I repeat: If you’re a good listener, be careful who you let find out.

I need to make people who like to vent to me stop talking down to me, especially when I’m smarter and more “with it” than they are.  The next person on whom I’ve got 30 IQ points who calls me “Sweetheart” is getting poop in their shoes.  Mine.

No, it’s not you.


How did I miss this from 2008?

Barack Obama and John McCain may differ on everything from U.S. policy in Iraq to how many town hall debates they should schedule but — who would have thought? — they share reading tastes.

The novel For Whom the Bells Toll [sic] by Ernest Hemingway is a shared favorite for both Barack Obama and John McCain McCain long has pinpointed Ernest Hemingway’s 1940 novel “For Whom the Bell Tolls” [sic] as his favorite book (for more on the presumptive Republican nominee’s favorite things, see this profile).

Obama, in a just-published interview with Rolling Stone co-founder and publisher Jann Wenner, names “For Whom the Bell Tolls” [sic] as one of the three books that have inspired him.

(Read more.)

I  know that Comrade Castro also has a photo of Papa hanging in his office.  I’m not taking a side on this; I just think it’s funny that so many people claim kinship with Papa, or, at least, admiration.


Riding the bus the other morning, I joked that Michael Moore is probably working on one of his signature documentaries about BP’s infuckingsane oil spill, our country’s dependence on oil and how certain political factions and certain oil companies (perhaps the industry itself) seem to be so close as to require lube and common-law legal sanction (what?).  I suggested that he must be calling it Spill, Baby, Spill! after the mindless and heartless chant among, well, morons two years ago.

I don’t recall what I’d consider sufficient fanfare when BP closed it’s alternative energy HQ last year, proving that anything “beyond petroleum” must mean either money or, how I’d like to refer to them, as BEYOND THE PIPELINE (and forgive me if greater minds have already made this pun).  By insufficient fanfare, I mean that even people I know without their heads completely up their collective butt[s] (which is to say only half, which is the best that most of us achieve) didn’t know about it.

Anyway, I’m hoping that Michael Moore checks WordPress tags because, if he’s not going to make a film with this title, he should.  Please do.  I’m interested in what choice of music we could look forward to and hearing certain political factions blubber when they have to answer questions they’re not prepared for, when they’re not chanting like Nazi’s or war protesters who don’t really believe what they’re saying.

I know I’m not the only one who’s disappointed in what appears to be a lack of action from President Obama.  What more can he do?  Well, I want to see a video going around YouTube featuring text that runs something like this.

Now I’m calling on all Americans to not only boycott BP [pause] but also to try and [pause] live a little differently [pause] because this oil spill is the fault of BP, yes [pause] we know that.  We know that this company is run by greedy white men who are backed by greedy white politicians.  [pause]  But do you know who really caused this oil spill, America?

[really big pause]

You did.

[big pause]

You brought this on us, you selfish, lazy motherfuckers.  [pause]  Your insistence on driving yourselves all over the place in your big fucking cars and trucks and SUVs.  [pause]  You short-sighted pieces of shit who complain that you “need” your fucking cars instead of using your imaginations and arranging your life, your location, your activities a little differently.  [pause]  Because when you say that you “need” your cars, you’re saying that you are unwilling to change anything about your life but instead insist that the oil industry, the auto industry, the basics of chemistry and physics through which you are killing our motherfucking planet –  [pause]  You’re insisting that these things all change so that you don’t have to.  [pause]  That, or you’re so fucking stupid and sheepish that you’re willing to believe that climate change is not real, that our fat fucking lazy stupid asses aren’t killing the planet on which we live.  [pause]  In which case, well, goddam.  What good are ya?  Reason won’t get at ya.

[pause]

Needing cheap oil is needing something we can’t always have.  Needing your car to live is not something you can always do.

[pause]

And the rest of you non-car-owning, self-righteous fucking elitists (yes, Johnny, I’m talking to you in Baltimore), think of all the plastic you use, all the gas it takes to get your hemp wallet to you in the UPS truck.  [pause]  You couldn’t live the way you live without cars, either, you goddam hippies.

[big pause]

So, my fellow Americans.  [pause]  Blame yourselves for this bullshit.  But still [pause], don’t fucking buy gas from BP with which to,  you know [pause], drive your fat asses around.

[big pause]

Thank you, and goodnight.

I want to hear nothing but family values types shouting for his impeachment for his angry and violent speech at people who might actually deserve pipes pumping oil into various of their orifices but who, in the land of the free, only get yelled at a lot by the President, himself a mighty speech-maker.  Then I will be happy.

Because I am living proof that, if you can’t actually do anything (or are unwilling to), you can just rant and cuss.  And you will feel better.


Says Pope Benedict XVI about why he won’t let priests officially “get some.” But there is an open letter from a large group of Italian women who have had relationships with priests to the Pope, urging him to pull his head out from under his, er, robes and realize that:

1) Priests are already engaging in sexual and romantic relationships, and now we know that you know.
2) Everyone needs to be loved (and, I would add, to get some).

I mean, it’s not like the Church is going to budge any time soon.  Had priests been allowed to marry in 1998 when I was getting not-so-gently urged into the seminary by my at-the-time pastor, I’d probably be a priest right now (for better for worse).   So maybe I dodged a bullet?  Then again, my wife and daughter would (I assume) still be the most important things in my life; so maybe not much would be different.  I’d have wasted my 20s  on a different kind of education, and it’s not like I don’t [still] enjoy Franciscan music.

I find this particular “scandal” not only less shocking (I can understand being attracted sexually to an adult woman or man, but not being attracted to young boys or girls) to my own sensibilities but also somehow more natural. Priests, who are people like you and I, get lonely and/or horny. Big surprise.  Being human, they act contrary to Church teachings sometimes.  Big surprise.

This could be a good thing.  I’m not excusing the abuse of minors by priests, since power was certainly involved.  But how many priests have  you known who were a little….off, uptight, creepy, clingy, etc. who might have been better off, not only of they had another individual with whom to share their lives, but also, well, were getting some?  I know a few lay people who have become less creepy when they started being in a sexual relationship, and I know a few people personally who were completely insufferable before getting laid on a regular basis (I’m not BSing you).  Am I saying that everyone is better off when we all get whoopy regularly?  Nah, but those among us who really need/want it are better off.

Of course, being the Catholic Church, if they were to relent and to allow priests get down like everyone else, they’d surely not extend this bit of humanity to homosexual priests.  So these folks would have to still live in secret, like two priests I knew when I was younger did.  It certainly wouldn’t fix everything if the Church merely allowed priests to marry, when gay priests can’t.  And, of course, there’s the whole women-can’t-be-priests thing.

I don’t think I’ll live to see an egalitarian or realistic version of the priesthood in my time.  But if I did, I’d likely see a healthier Church to boot.

Read more at NPR.


Before Charlotte was born, we bought her a new Moleskine (sized A4) for a first-year journal, and I bought a new camera with the cash I was planning on buying an acoustic bass with. My better half is a talented historian, and I’m a little obsessive and compulsive. We planned on recording everything. Everything.

I didn’t mean to, but I’ve found myself watching important moments through my camera’s LCD screen, and I’m so behind in journaling (and I haven’t cracked Charlotte’s volume open) that I can’t stand to sit down and begin to write anything at all. Today, I noticed a nice red stuck pixel in the middle of my camera’s pictures. Great. I know that bad pixels are a fact of digital photography, but a red one right in the middle is disconcerting. I spent the night trying out CHDK, but their website and download pages have been down all night. And the firmware version is conflicting with what it’s supposed to be. Canon said to send it back to them. Okay, that’s like $15-$20 in shipping and a week or two (or three) without my camera.

In itself, that’s not the end of the world. I could do something scummy, like buy my camera over again and return the one I have now, since my return period is over. Aside from being scummy, I’m sentimental, and I don’t want to do that. This camera took Charlotte’s first picture ever. But I find myself hoping that she doesn’t do anything too memorable in the meantime. And this is stupid.

For another thing, if it were me, I’d rather hear the story from my parents than see the photos. My parents took tons and tons of photos of their boys as children. But my own memory and hearing my parents tell me things that I don’t remember serve me better for my nostalgic needs than photo albums. In fact, there are some I’ve probably never even bothered to look through.

I’ve developed a strange “I’m getting older” and “important things are happening now” penchant for writing everything down and recording everything (that sounds like it’s own blog post) over the last few years. I worked all day and spent half the time Charlotte was awake messing with my camera like her childhood depended on it. But worrying more about some photos and posting them on Facebook seems like a waste of energy to me these days.

But, you know. Tell me that.

I don’t know. “NEED” might be a better word, no?

If you can’t imagine starting your morning without a triple espresso shot or at least a hot cup of Joe (see our blogger’s logo), you’re not alone. Eight in 10 adults claim to be consumers.

But a new study suggests that coffee doesn’t really give us caffeine fiends the jolt we think it does – it just returns us to a normal state of alertness after a night of withdrawal.

So why do some people become drawn to caffeine in the first place, and others never touch the stuff?

(More.)