Interesting, if a little contentious, article about the decline of organized religion, especially in its relations to American politics:

“Yet somehow, in the last 30 years, people of faith were hustled and hoodwinked into regarding the GOP platform as a lost gospel. Somehow, low taxes for the wealthy and deregulation of industry became the very message of Christ. Somehow, hostility to science, gays, Muslims and immigrants became the very meaning of faith. And somehow, Christianity became — or at least, came to seem — a wholly owned subsidiary of the Republican Party.”

Color me embarrassed, but I didn’t think “believers” believing outside of organized religion were really novel entities.  Maybe there are just more now?

“Who can blame people for saying, “If that’s faith, count me out”? Has atheism ever had a better salesman than Jerry Falwell, blaming the Sept. 11 attacks on the ACLU, or Pat Robertson laying Haiti’s earthquake
off on an ancient curse?
But what of those who are not atheists? What of those who feel the blessed assurance that there is more to this existence than what we can see or empirically prove? What of those who seek a magnificent faith that commits and compels, and find churches offering only a shriveled faith that marginalizes and demeans?”

Read the article here.  Pitts makes some good points, even if he does seem to be generalizing more than I’d be comfortable doing in such a contentious piece.

I’m wondering when the religious and political over-lapping in this country is going to really come to a head.  It’s bad enough when religious leaders tell you how to vote in political elections.  Things are really going to shit when people who are elected get to start telling us all how to act (by the law), according to their own religious beliefs. And it’s certainly not only Christians doing it.  Secular humanists and others often attempt to legislate their beliefs.  But at least they don’t so often conflict with the Constitution or seek to take away other people’s freedoms.


Says Pope Benedict XVI about why he won’t let priests officially “get some.” But there is an open letter from a large group of Italian women who have had relationships with priests to the Pope, urging him to pull his head out from under his, er, robes and realize that:

1) Priests are already engaging in sexual and romantic relationships, and now we know that you know.
2) Everyone needs to be loved (and, I would add, to get some).

I mean, it’s not like the Church is going to budge any time soon.  Had priests been allowed to marry in 1998 when I was getting not-so-gently urged into the seminary by my at-the-time pastor, I’d probably be a priest right now (for better for worse).   So maybe I dodged a bullet?  Then again, my wife and daughter would (I assume) still be the most important things in my life; so maybe not much would be different.  I’d have wasted my 20s  on a different kind of education, and it’s not like I don’t [still] enjoy Franciscan music.

I find this particular “scandal” not only less shocking (I can understand being attracted sexually to an adult woman or man, but not being attracted to young boys or girls) to my own sensibilities but also somehow more natural. Priests, who are people like you and I, get lonely and/or horny. Big surprise.  Being human, they act contrary to Church teachings sometimes.  Big surprise.

This could be a good thing.  I’m not excusing the abuse of minors by priests, since power was certainly involved.  But how many priests have  you known who were a little….off, uptight, creepy, clingy, etc. who might have been better off, not only of they had another individual with whom to share their lives, but also, well, were getting some?  I know a few lay people who have become less creepy when they started being in a sexual relationship, and I know a few people personally who were completely insufferable before getting laid on a regular basis (I’m not BSing you).  Am I saying that everyone is better off when we all get whoopy regularly?  Nah, but those among us who really need/want it are better off.

Of course, being the Catholic Church, if they were to relent and to allow priests get down like everyone else, they’d surely not extend this bit of humanity to homosexual priests.  So these folks would have to still live in secret, like two priests I knew when I was younger did.  It certainly wouldn’t fix everything if the Church merely allowed priests to marry, when gay priests can’t.  And, of course, there’s the whole women-can’t-be-priests thing.

I don’t think I’ll live to see an egalitarian or realistic version of the priesthood in my time.  But if I did, I’d likely see a healthier Church to boot.

Read more at NPR.

RI Bishop Kennedy
Not working to legislate your own religion gets you banned from receiving Communion?  Sure, the Church can do what they want (and I’ll refrain from references to the 2003 scandals), but I think religious leaders in this country are completely misunderstanding their role in politics and especially their members’ role as politicians.

PROVIDENCE, R.I. (AP) — Roman Catholic Bishop Thomas Tobin has banned Rep. Patrick Kennedy from receiving Communion, the central sacrament of the church, in Rhode Island because of the congressman’s support for abortion rights, Kennedy said in a newspaper interview published Sunday.

The decision by the outspoken prelate, reported on The Providence Journal’s Web site, significantly escalates a bitter dispute between Tobin, an ultra orthodox bishop, and Kennedy, a son of the nation’s most famous Roman Catholic family.
RI Bishop Kennedy
“The bishop instructed me not to take Communion and said that he has instructed the diocesan priests not to give me Communion,” Kennedy told the paper in an interview conducted Friday.

Kennedy said the bishop had explained the penalty by telling him “that I am not a good practicing Catholic because of the positions that I’ve taken as a public official,” particularly on abortion. (More….)

What choice do you have? Be a bad Catholic or be a bad American? Last I checked, it was a sin to get an abortion, not a sin to NOT work to make them harder to get. And last I checked, Congress[wo]men were elected to be representatives of American citizens, not representatives of their churches. No matter what you think of Kennedy and no matter what you think of abortion rights, the Catholic Church and this particular bishop, you have to admit that Kennedy was not elected to be a Good Catholic Representative and to legislate his Catholic faith.  Not all of the citizens he represents are Catholic, right?

Am I calling politicians that put their faith over the office they were elected to bad Americans?

I love all life.
I love it enough to define it.
I love it enough to portray grisly images of aborted fetuses and bloody baby dolls.
I love it enough to force it on people who might not be ready or capable of making it not just A life, but a GOOD life.
I love life enough to know what’s best for everyone.
A book told me so.
(Wait, no it didn’t.)

I also love life enough to spend my energy helping the poor and disadvantaged.
I spend my time and energy working on educational efforts to help eradicate unwanted pregnancies.
I help with adoption efforts.
I want all kids to live in loving environments, even with same-sex couples.
I do everything I can to prevent the situations in which abortion is a desirable option.
I think sexual education and birth-control can help.
Wait, no I don’t.
(I don’t do any of that.)

And if I did, I would certainly be the exception to the usual old biddy standing outside the hospital with a picture of death when I want you to love life.

I’d rather protest things which are legally sanctioned and none of my business and make people who share my point of view all look crazy, cold-hearted and backward than actually help anyone.

As someone who doesn’t go to, teach at, work at or give money to a Catholic university, I know what’s best for it.  God forbid people in the faith whose name means UNIVERSAL be tolerant of anything.

With a lot of the pro-marriage, pro-family, pro-”Christian”* crap we all get to look at, it’s at least…refreshing to see some diverse views in ad space.  Read about DC’s “Why believe in a God?” ads. People are pissed!

Why,  oh why, do some faithful people get so fucking upset when there are people who don’t believe what they believe?  I understand the urge to evangelize, but come on.  Ignore non-Christian religious folks.  How many strands of Christianity are there, and how much do they really have in common?

I get people’s religious beliefs shoved in my face constantly, without shoving my lack of belief in anyone’s face.  I’m glad someone is doing it, though, no matter how I feel about what I might call “God” in place of any faith in my lapsed Catholicism.

Belief that can’t be held alone is weak belief indeed.

*[What's a "Christian"?  What's a vegetable?  Show me "vegetable"!  Christians are usually members of a Church or denomination of some kind.  Be more specific, Johnny!  Asparagus!]